Over
the Thanksgiving holiday, I suggested to my family (on me) that we see Leo
Tolstoy's tale of love and marriage in imperial Russia in a modern adaptation
of Anna Karenina http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPGLRO3fZnQ
What
a disappointment it was! Having not seen
any prior screen version and only reading the novel, the film opens with a
shaky start as a staged performance and is disjointed. I questioned who was playing whom and what
their purpose was, and when the characters traipse across the stage, I couldn’t
wait for the tale of doomed love to begin.
Although
the visuals are often magical and overly-indulgent—the film is overtly
theatrical and a few scenes are simply ridiculous.
The
film like the book isn’t concerned with observing social etiquette—it's about
raw, often uncontrollable passions, emotional and sexual betrayal, mixed-up
people with mixed-up lives.
Keira
Knightley stars as Anna, literature's most tragic adulteress. Jude Law is
Anna's cold-hearted husband, Alexey Karenin, a statesman who is principled to
the point of callousness.
Anna
Karenina
was not the book Tolstoy intended to write, but his thoughts turned
increasingly to an incident that haunted him: A neighbor's mistress had thrown
herself under a train after being jilted by her lover. From this tragic seed
grew an epic of sex, duty, marriage, and moral regeneration that many consider
the greatest novel ever written.
I expected more from filmmaker Joe Wright who gave audiences Atonement certainly the film that Ian McEwan's novel deserved. I left the theatre feeling jilted myself, for having thrown away good money on a stylized film with little character development.
I expected more from filmmaker Joe Wright who gave audiences Atonement certainly the film that Ian McEwan's novel deserved. I left the theatre feeling jilted myself, for having thrown away good money on a stylized film with little character development.
No comments:
Post a Comment